The Ball is Flat

For all his virtues, the Specious One has many faults, and over the next few weeks and months he'll be using all of his media-centric virtues to cover up, spackle and run rough-shod over the last three years that he has been guiding the club. It'll be double-speak, hilarious in its aptitude to bring the Cult of Mou back in the fold, but for those immune to the full-board Special-One propaganda you'll be thinking of all the incidents that led Real Madrid and his Mou-Better Blues-ness to part ways and wondering how it could have been anyone else's fault but his own.

Shortly after being hired he took it upon himself to single out Pedro Leon. He benched him and marginalized the kid and for what reason, that he wasn't 'Zidane or Maradona', that he was Valdano´s buy and then much later he bought Callejon to perform the same role. Frankly I'd rather have Pedro. In that same presser he referred to the criticisms of Gregorio Manzano with the much used refrain, 'Who's that? I don't know that person.' He did it with Manolo Preciado and a dozen other coaches and directors as well. It's cute if you do it once, and I gather the English media love that sort of thing considering how starved they are for any news that isn't predigested pablum, but this is just nonsense.

He told off referee Paradas Romero with a hearty "go to hell" after being thrown out at Murcia and then wondered why the ref threw him out of a match at Villarreal a year later. He did the same with Clos-Gomez and his 13 errors in a Madrid win against Sevilla, but then wondered why the ref has continued to be a thorn in his side since.  He complained about the calendar, that the league office was conspiring against them, 'laughing at their expense', but when called on it by a reporter that said Barcelona were faced with the same problems Mou called him a hypocrite. He never said why, but that's the word he used.

Of course, he had a fractious relationship with the Spanish press all along culminating in that incident where he bullied the Radio Marca reporter in a Bernabeu closet with five of his own bodyguards and threatened the guy saying ¨I am a top manager and you are a piece of crap¨, and then wondered why even Real Madrid´s house organ Marca hated him. It´s no wonder the press and the refs treated him poorly.

He fell out with Valdano, refusing the guy access to the Real Madrid plane or travelling with the squad, fired everyone with any bit of power above him, and then wondered why he'd been singled out as the cause for Real Madrid's problems.  It was only the beginning of his attacks on the club and the organization. ¨Madrid isn´t structured to have the scale it has. There is no functional empathy there.¨ He picked a fight with Castilla´s manager Toril of all people, refusing to use canteranos or youngsters despite injuries to the first team.

He called himself the youngster´s manager, the guy who used more of them than anyone else in recent history, but conveniently forgot that none of them have had any lasting impact in his team selection and many of them have decided to move on like every other generation of Castilla players before them. He blamed his first team players, benching Ramos, Khedira, Ozil, and ultimately what doomed him, the club captain Iker Casillas. For a guy whose players in the past have spoken up for him years past their association with them, I would say there are few on the squad that are going to miss him.

People will make a huge deal about him poking Tito Vilanova´s eye, threatening referees in car-parks, and dealing with the squad´s constant sifting of insider information to the press. I mean every club has leaks. Does he think the press will be any less forgiving with John Terry around at Stamford Bridge or that information won´t filter out to the Daily Mail? The reason he´s leaving isn´t that he did any of these things, nor certainly the steaming load of propaganda that Florentino Perez flung the other day, placing the blame on the press not letting Mourinho do his job.

He, as Arancha Diaz so eloquently put it in her article for Zoom News, ¨never understood that the key to be loved at Real Madrid was to not place his quest for His Third, Su Tercera above the club´s own for The Tenth, La Decima.¨ She adds that ¨when he was hired he said that, `It isn´t wonderful to manage at Real Madrid, but it is to win at Real Madrid.´ He leaves almost three years later still not having understood that lesson. That it is fundamentally important to become part of that history and not to become its protagonist.¨ I couldn´t have said it better myself.

First Kit: Real Madrid CF released their new Adidas kits for 2013-2014. As usual the first kit is an all white kit with dark stripes. but instead of blue or black adidas stripes  like last year or the very classy gold stripes of two years ago, the sportswear king have come out with these singular black ones. The one new novelty is the extra orange piping around the collar, sleeves and axilla. It´s certainly new but I´m not sold on the color scheme.

Second Kit: does anyone think that either adidas or José Mourinho had a hand in designing this especially horrid second kit for the club? Other than the shirt sponsor and the badge, oh and let´s not forget that rather obtrusive orange piping on  the side, this is a Chelsea FC kit. Now I´m not a huge fan of away kits in general, other than the all-black kit that Real Madrid played in a few years ago, this one is especially putrid. It´s no insult on the Blues, but Real Madrid don´t need to borrow anyone else´s history.

Third Kit: well, it certainly is a year of diminishing returns. I´d give the first kit a B+ grade, more for its intention than its execution. The third hit is a solid C; not entirely original or expected for Real Madrid, but people´d buy it, maybe as an ironic statement with Mou moving to West London, but the third kit is Valdano´s last curse. It´s ¨shit-on-a-stick¨ as he referred to Rafa Benitez´s Liverpool, but I think we can use it for this. It´s mustard I believe but no mustard I´ve ever seen at the deli counter, and quite frankly other than Wolverhampton fans looking for a La Liga club, who would buy this moldy piece of lunch-meat spread? It´s a boring set-piece, a dearth of originality in this year´s batch of kit-wear.

Overall Grade: B-

On Tuesday Barcelona´s kit sponsor Nike unveiled the new kits that FC Barcelona will wear for the upcoming 2013-14 season. Instead of the bleeding-edge colors of the current blaugrana like first kit, Nike returns to the more traditional and conservative choice: using the narrow vertical stripes of past kits, but makes a bold decision to include colors of the Senyera, or flag of Catalunya, as the basis for the second kit.

Last season Nike released some innovative designs with wide stripes and degraded colors that left many cold. They have decided then to go back to basics in the first kit. As with the 2010 kit, the neck is yellow but the distinctive collar this time is more of a beak in shape rather than the more rounded one before. The current gradient color scheme is kept only on the sleeves and there are two significant additions to the shirt. The Catalan flag is included on the back and near inside the collar. The pants are blue and the stockings have the same gradient as the sleeves with a thin yellow strip on top.

They decided, in response to a request by supporters, to include a similar design to the home kit but using the red and yell of of the Senyera in the overall design of the second kit. It is the first time in the history of FC Barcelona that they have used this pattern, a symbol of regional independence, in their kit design. The neck is round instead of beak-shaped, their shorts are the same red as the vertical stripes, and fortunately the degraded colors of their current away kit continue to be seen only on their sleeves.

Lastly, after never accepting a shirt sponsor across the front, they paid Unicef for the right to locate their logo in their deal of a few years ago (they continue to have a small logo on the back of the shirt), then
they accepted funding from non-profit firm 'Qatar Foundation' that falls under the umbrella of 'Qatar Sports Investments' it is troubling too to note that for the first time FC Barcelona have a shirt sponsor that bears the name of a private company with the inclusion of 'Qatar Airways' across the front.

Grade A-: It is a much better fit to the conservative image of Barcelona than last year´s `champaigne wishes and caviar dreams´ ensemble, but Barcelona´s second kits continue to be subpar. Maybe it´s that they never fit stylistically to their classic blaugrana design, the last 4 or 5 have been brutal, and while better than all of them this one continues to be just a bit ho-hum.

The week ended for Real Madrid with another series in a long line of indignities: losing 1-2 in the Copa del Rey final to an Atletico Madrid squad that hadn't beaten their cross-town rivals in any competition since 1999. It could have been different, they had the chances and should have been head and shoulders above an Atleti that couldn't match them on talent alone, but the colchoneros had grit and determination. This is not your older brother's Atletico Madrid that would wilt amidst the pressure; they are very much cut of the same cloth as their stylishly fit coach Diego 'El Cholo' Simeone, but it might have been a different story had Real Madrid not lacked some key pieces. I'm not saying the obvious squad losses due to injury or sanction, but the self-inflicted ones that have kept the merengues at bay most of the year: the demotion of key elements of the squad like Pepe and Iker Casillas in the Cup Final, but others throughout the campaign for one reason or another, and the culprit of this mess is Jose Mourinho.

It's been a contentious three year reign in charge. While few people are questioning his CV, frankly he's arguably one of the top football managers of all time, he's met his match at Real Madrid. Barcelona are often referred to as being more than a club, that they say represents an ideal or a socio-political movement, but Real Madrid really are more than a club, it's like their playing the Game of Thrones in the capital and the knives are for whomever takes the coach's seat. Now, Mou likes to think of himself as an aficionado of Sun-Tzu or Machiavelli, and his confrontational tactics might have worked anywhere else, but Spain is a different animal, or rather it's Madrid that's the difference.

Real Madrid is a living breathing entity kept alive by the obsession of supporters, ultras, the media, socios, administators, politicians, and arguably the State itself, and all pulling that great beast in directions that would suit themselves and not necessarily anyone else. It's a process we followed four years ago at the tail end of the Ramon Calderon presidency, with its corruption and ineptitude, and everyone looked hopefully at the return of Florentino Perez with guarded hope. See if you see any parallels.

The failed pursuit of Cristiano Ronaldo left them with a major publicity disaster, losing the subsequent war of words with Sir Alex Ferguson; where the Scot lamented the abuse of power by the Madrid giants and gave a misguided history lesson about the club’s attachment to the Franco regime; Ramon Calderon called him senile, and subsequent negotiations collapsed. That triggered the Robinho trifecta. The Brazilian cried on public television for Chelsea to save him, the London club printed replica shirts for the Brazilian, and an angry Madrid subsequently sold him to the Sultan of Manchester City instead. To replace the Brazilian’s late exit, the club had clearly had no backup for the Ronaldo signing, so they began a series of impulse buys: Rafael Van der Vaart first, and then Klaas-Jan Huntelaar, Lassana Diarra and most surprisingly Julien Faubert from West Ham, who came to Madrid in January with no knowledge that Madrid had even been up for him, and neither it seems did Real Madrid management. No one wanted to take credit or blame, a hallmark of the Ramon Calderon Presidency, but nothing new if you know the history of Real Madrid. They fired Bernd Schuster for essentially giving up on the club; the German was frozen out of a power struggle with sporting director Peja Mijatovich and hired Juande Ramos who had failed so miserably at Tottenham. They were drilled out of the Copa del Rey in November by a third division side in Real Union which had last won the Cup in 1927 and they were drilled out of the Champions League 5-0 on aggregate by Liverpool marking the fifth year in a row that the club had exited the competition in the first knockout stage. Even Ramon Calderon was forced to step down from the club after questions rose about the validity of a club election in December that had ratified club finances. The club was resigned to the fact that the league was for Barcelona. The election was on the horizon. Florentino Perez was returning to his post and set to usher another run of Galacticos for the merengues.

We tried to end that piece positively, looking to the new Perez-Revolution in the works and it was certainly going to be better than what was already in place, but we had our doubts knowing how the last Galacticos era ended under Perez. Four years on with another election in sight, there is much that has changed, a league title, a couple of domestic trophies, and they've gone farther in the Champions League, but there's still more that has stayed the same. Barcelona have won the league again, the hegemony is still alive and running despite what some pundits have written, but more glaringly is the institutional chaos that Real Madrid seems to breed by right.

Four years ago they were pursuing Cristiano, but now they're just trying to keep him happy otherwise he'll bolt? It's ironic considering that trying to sign him couldn't keep Robinho happy and now with the prospects of losing Cristiano they're throwing the bank at Robinho's heir at Santos, Neymar? You couldn't have written a better best-seller. They swapped Mijatovich for Valdano and then for Mourinho himself, but there is no grand plan. The oars aren't rowing in the same direction and with the constant movement of players, coaches and systems in and out of the organization Real Madrid has maintained in stasis for the last 10 years.

There is much talk about an end of an era in Barcelona, that no club could ever continue that level of dominance forever, and they're right, no club can, but as long as Real Madrid is their only rival, and los blancos continue to make wrong decision after another, there is no telling how long Barcelona can continue to dominate (domestically at least).

***As a post-script, if they were to change the dynamic or plan for a real new beginning, one that they could have started at the end of the Calderon era four years ago, then we'll follow the course that we did at La Liga Weekly and postulate a Real Madrid 3.0: what they should do over the next Summer to change their course. Any suggestions are welcomed.

For years the club has been lauded for its efforts in bringing home-grown players, players who cut their teeth on the pitches of the old La Masia training facility. It is as many have said a veritable gold-mine. Of their starting 11 that played against Real Sociedad on the first day of the season 7 of them stepped through those ancient farmhouse-doors in their formative years, as did 15 out of their 23 man-squad. I think that's about to change.

It is one thing for experienced players like David Villa or Victor Valdéz to leave the club, for whatever personal or footballing reasons that may stem from, but it is quite another what is happening at La Masia. Valdéz blames amongst other reasons his ¨mental exhaustion stemming from being the club´s starting keeper for 10 years¨, and Villa has never been the same since returning from injury, so the club are certain to capitalize on it. Tottenham are offering 15 million euros for El Guaje, Adriano is for sale at around 10 million euros, but the club aren´t just gutting the experienced players like Abidal who is out of contract or Bojan who was never going to return from Italy, it´s the fire sale they apparently have put up for players on Barcelona-B.

According to Mundo Deportivo they have Isaac Cuenca and Jonathan dos Santos valued at 4 million, Fontàs and Afellay at 3 million, and many others are on the block as well. Other papers are reporting that Thiago Alcantara is on the block for 25 million euros. Sergi Roberto could be loaned out, or sold with a buy-back-clause like Bojan had with AS Roma, and laughably Cesc Fabregas is being linked with a move back to England.

I realize its the time of the season, clubs always sell players and buy other players, newspapers report on those stories and even ones that aren't true, but when a club decides that it will buy a series of players to shore up their accepted needs and they announced they were looking for top-class players at forward, at central defense and in goal,then they are going to need to pay more than the 50 million euros or so they usually spend per off-season. It looks to me, and the papers have been reporting it this way, that there is a fire-sale going on to afford the likes of a Neymar from Santos, a Thiago Silva from PSG and a Marc-Andre ter Stegen from Borussia Monchendgladbach.

It's the nature of the game that there will always be movement, and Barcelona have never shunned the market, but they have in the past decade used the players from La Masia to supplement those high-level signings that sustain all big clubs. Their ability to develop their own talent is a virtue that club officials and supporters have held over others, proof that they are mes que un club, more than a club, but as with other lofty parts of the club credo like eschewing shirt sponsorships, this too is passing. This looks like a return frankly to that era between Cruyff's Dream Team and Laporta's take-over where Barcelona bought huge players like Luís Figo, Patrick Kluivert, Luis Enrique and Rivaldo and saw home-grown players like Luis Garcia, Ivan de la Pena and Mikel Arteta leaving to make their names elsewhere.

Diario As is reporting that PSG wants Cristiano and that their owner Al-Thani feels he´s being ambushed and thinks about offering 100 million for the forward. As for L´Equipe, the French club will facilitate the exit of Carlo Ancelotti if Madrid accept negotiations for the Portuguese player. I´m actually not on-board with this story. I don´t think PSG is a good fit for Cristiano and I think the Parisians know it. I don´t think money is the issue, it´s the image rights, and PSG wouldn´t be able to give the amount of exposure that Real Madrid or Manchester United might. What they´re probably trying to negotiate is the sale of one of the other Madrid players on the back of allowing Ancelotti´s release. Would Karim Benzema leave Madrid for a return to France? Would Gonzalo Higuain?

Marca are on high alert concerning the Copa del Rey final. They have a picture of the two fountains in Madrid that the supporters of both clubs use to celebrate trophies. Sergio Ramos came out as the club spokesman with the absence of Mourinho. He appealed to the group to win the final, he said that the club is above anything or anyone else. Atléti´s coach Diego Simeone in his press-conference that it doesn´t worry him that Madrid are the favorites. ¨Nobody´d put two bits on us.¨ Gabi added that, ¨this is a unique opportunity to break the slump.¨ It is hard to believe that Real Madrid can lose this game. The years and years of bad performances have just led to this idea that no matter how good Atléti are (and this is their greatest ever side I believe) that they will never be able to do it against Real Madrid.

Diario Sport is helping to launch that final assault on Neymar. Representatives of the club are in Brazil to seal the forward´s deal. Barça are offering 57 million euros while Madrid are doubling it. Granted, the player would have to pay a significant penalty for reneging on a pre-contract agreement, so it´s up to the player. If Santos approves of the transfer he´d be a Barcelona player today. He could say his farewells on Sunday in front of the home fans. El Mundo Deportivo are following suit with an almost identical campaign of their own.

To think that I respected Martin Samuel once, when he wrote for a respectable paper, but since leaving that perch, and admittedly in his profession there are hardly many choices left anymore what with the slow march to journalistic oblivion for most print media, but he´s certainly fallen off the credibility map here. I realize that he is just playing to the gallery but his latest piece for the Daily Mail is just foul.

I´m not going to comment on the title, ¨Pellegrini spent £200m at Real and won nothing... Surely we have better managers here¨, since he probably didn't write it, but I will answer or clarify some erroneous facts or conclusions.

My main problem with the piece is that it´s just not that insightful. I thought Martin Samuel was a bit more urbane or continental in his tastes. This smacks of the same sort of hatchet-job that was done on Mauricio Pochettino when he took over Southampton or when Roberto Mancini himself took over City in 2009, but what can you say when you pander to an audience that was already chanting ¨You can stick your Pellegrini up your arse¨ this weekend.

It´s short-sighted and wrong and sets the club up for trouble, highlighting the tact that the English press will obviously take on this story long-term, that the club was wrong to fire Mancini (even though he lost to soon-to-be relegated Wigan in the FA Cup final) and that the club´s management is clueless as to how to run an English club. More importantly it highlights a rather detestable strain of British nativism that I thought went out with Dr. Who style police boxes and hooligan encounters between West Ham and Millwall firms.

As if handing a hundred million pound war-kitty to a British manager has worked for Manchester City before (see Mark Hughes). Manchester City have a long-term plan to build a squad that can compete and they have been more than patient with Roberto Mancini; a change needed to be made and Pellegrini was available, someone who Sporting Director Txiki Begiristain was already familiar with at Barcelona, and yet there are questions about the hire, about the continuity of the two former Barcelona administrators? It's their prerogative to hire someone who fits their philosophy. Could Pellegrini, as Samuels posits, have got Wigan playing better football than Manchester City, or gotten them to win the FA Cup?

If not for a bitterly contested end to their quarter-final match in this year´s Champions League tie against Borussia Dortmund it might be Pellegrini preparing a Wembley Final for Malaga against Bayern Munich. I´d add also that Wigan have the more stable financial support, and he´s proven that he can compete in every league he´s coached in. It is doubtful that he´d have Wigan constantly fearing the drop every single year like Roberto Martínez has, so yes I think he´d have either club playing better in England.

The rest of the piece is filled with just lazy reporting. Does it matter that he isn´t a manager who was born in the British system like Hughes or who was raised in it like Martinez, and that if he had it would allow him to what, succeed better in the system? That´s nonsensical, to think what, that ¨British managers play every match in the public eye. We know every mistake, each little failure. We know that Alan Pardew struggled at Charlton Athletic and his success at Newcastle United was not maintained. So it counts against him.¨ What counts against him? That he didn´t do his internship in the English system, where ex-players and inexperienced coaches thrive with the bare minimum of tactical training? Here´s a guy that succeeded in South America and did what few South American coaches outside of Argentina do, and that´s succeed in one of the most competitive leagues in Europe. He also cut his teeth in European competitions, so that argument doesn't wash at all.

Then there´s also the argument in the article that Pellegrini has had much more financial support than has been reported in the past:; examine why there are no titles despite working first for Ceramics magnate Fernando Roig and then for one of the wealthiest people on the planet in Sheik Al-Thani? Dig a little deeper, though. Imagine working for a club like Villarreal that pulls in less than 30 million euros in television money. Their last shirt-sponsor was for an airport in nearby Castellon that never opened, a ghost airport where the runways are too short and no passenger has ever walked through its terminal. That was 2011. They have gone sponsor-less since then, and did they get the sort of payout for being relegated like Wigan are sure to receive if they go down? He´s actually had it even worse at Malaga. Other than an initial investment of around 59 million euros at Malaga, the club have struggled to keep their best players. Remove the 20 million euros they spent on Santi Cazorla from Villarreal, and Malaga spent on the average of only 4.5 million euros on players that first year.

It´s gotten worse. Very little new investment has come through, the club have struggled to pay wages, and their owner has disappeared to the Middle East for months at a time, appearing mainly on twitter when a particularly good rant about corruption in the league office riles him. The fact that Malaga aren´t allowed in Europe this year because of ¨financial improprieties¨ has more to do with unpaid tax-debt than playing fast and loose with investment. It's a miracle he's been able to compete at all with the sort of support. Face it, Pellegrini has earned this shot at the big-time and in that light I think I will comment on that title then.

Pellegrini failed in his only shot to date running a big club, or at least that´s the public perception, but he didn't spend 200 million pounds at Real Madrid - Jorge Valdano and Florentino Perez did; he wasn't a Premier League style manager with full say towards buying and selling players. They sold Arjen Robben and Wesley Snejder against his wishes and they bought players he didn't want. "I didn't have a voice or a vote at Madrid. They sign the best players, but not the best players needed in a certain position. It’s no good having an orchestra with the 10 best guitarists if I don’t have a pianist. Real Madrid have the best guitarists, but if I ask them to play the piano they won’t be able to do it so well. He [Perez] sold players that I considered important. We didn't win the Champions League because we didn't have a squad properly structured to be able to win it.¨ So how can you blame him, and as for the second idea that there are better managers, better home-grown managers in England than Manuel Pellegrini?

He took two second division sides and had them a heartbeat away from the Champions League glory. Villarreal were a Juan Roman Riquelme penalty miss away from sending the 2006 semi-final against Arsenal into extra-time. They were relegated a year after he left. Malaga were seconds away from relegation a year before he took over and look where they've been this year. I´d say he can handle the job. In fact I think Manchester City stole one of the best managers in Europe, let alone anyone in Martin Samuel's Little Britain.

The renewal process of Cristiano Ronaldo’s contract at Real Madrid has been in a holding pattern for practically the last two seasons. Is it a question of money, or respect, or some other ancillary matter that is keeping Real Madrid from signing arguably the greatest player in the world? Does he want the captaincy, or a return to more familiar haunts at Manchester United? All those are possible I guess, but what hasn’t been talked about much is that both the player and his agent have been concerned about controlling a greater percentage of his image rights, the sale of his shirts and posters and anything identifying itself as being him, since he was signed in the first place. 

The Portuguese winger himself told Marca that, "For me, I’d settle on retiring at the Bernabeu, but there are things that depend on the decisions of other people" in a pointed barb at the club itself. The club have a policy of sharing only the 50% that Ronaldo, like his teammates, is currently assigned. It's a partnership, one that worked for David Beckham and dozens of galacticos before him, but not one he's willing to forego?

His contract already specifies that Real Madrid are not due compensation for "any of the agreements already in place before his signing; only those he signed after June 2009 will be subject to the equitable distribution clause." Since then, the striker has hardly reached any agreement with new companies, just reinforced the ones already in place. In addition, to compensate for the loss of half of the player's image rights under the initial contract, his agent Jorge Mendes negotiated a special clause in the contract that increased his own compensation should any contract renewal be negotiated. Any renewal would be far higher percentage for himself than in the initial contract. That 's another added expense if the club want to resign the player.

It'll take a minimum of 155 million euros to initiate that renewal, or so that's what Ecodiario.es reported this week, so his yearly salary would be on the outskirts of 30 million euros per season according to the new tax laws put in play by Mariano Rajoy's government. It's not an investment that club officials want to consider with no ability for recompense. It's probably why the club have offered the moon to Neymar over the last few weeks. If any club is willing to give that sort of contract to a player who, despite his top conditioning and focus, is essentially two years away from the precipice considering the expectancy of football players at the elite level, then it's not Real Madrid.

It's why I think it is looking more and more likely that the club will allow him to serve out his contract and Cristiano Ronaldo will be in another kit in the next two years. He can serve out the remainder of his days with a club like Manchester United that don't need his image rights to make money and in 5 years there will be another Ballon D'or/Great Player of the World and Real Madrid will likely have him in tow. A smart move? Unlikely, but there we are, on the precipice of Financial Fair Play and even primadonnas might have to carry their own lunchbags soon enough.